Monday, November 19, 2007
Chapter 5
This chapter touches on the privacy issues related to surveillance. It talks about satellite, video cameras, and microphone capabilities. As I read this book I am always taking into account that it was written in the late nineties, and I wonder how these issues have changed. I know that we now have even more accurate satellite imagery, and it is readily available to the public for free through websites such as Google Earth. The government has had satellite image capabilities since the 50’s which was classified information until 1996. It makes me wonder what’s classified now that we won’t know about for another 50 years. One main point that the author makes is how we have become numb to video surveillance, we don’t even notice the cameras anymore. There used to be a time when the public felt very uncomfortable around cameras and fought to keep them out of public areas as much as possible, MIT actually had a campus rule about public cameras. However, today cameras are commonplace and we have given up the fight and accepted them as part of our public life. It is true that when you’re in public anyone can see you and take note of what you’re doing, but technology has made it increasingly easy to observe the public often in unnecessary ways. It’s funny how many places will videotape you without your permission, but they won’t allow you to photograph or videotape them or their place of business. However, surveillance equipment is now readily available to consumers allowing them to watch over their home and anyone that is in or around it. Be careful what you do when you think you’re alone, because these days you’re never really alone.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
That is an interesting input you brought up about how things have changed since this book was written. We certainly don't react the same way to many things now, in regards to our privacy, as in the past. There will surley be some more changes to come.
Hopefully, there will be more rules and regulations placed upon the use of video surveillance without our permission. Especially when it comes to using this data for marketing purposes.
Video surveillance can help identify and sometimes deter crime from taking place. How often are criminals caught on camera robbing a gas station or convenience store? I think this is a reasonable trade-off for being videotaped without permission.
Yes I believe that there are necessary forms of surveillance to protect the public and catch criminals, but where do we draw the line?
You bring up an interesting point about us accepting surveillance though businesses do not allow for consumers to video tape them. I remember being in New York at Tiffany's and trying to take a picture of a canary diamond that was in a huge display case. Before I could ever snap the shot, an employee approached me very quickly threatening to confiscate my camera. They claimed it was for security purposes. After all, I am pretty threatening, especially since I was like 15.
Post a Comment